Can you name a leader under 40 solving social problems?

No Name

Even at the risk of making some broad generational generalizations, there’s little question that Millennials across all sectors share something in common -- a burning desire to make a positive impact in the world. It’s built into our DNA and it’s something that is becoming more and more apparent as the blurring of lines among sectors creates enormous opportunities to collectively solve some of our most pressing social problems.  But who are these leaders driving change in our communities -- and is cross-sector collaboration really something that's all talk and no action?

That’s part of what the American Express NGen Fellows, a group of nonprofit leaders under the age of 40, chose to tackle in a recent report released earlier this week. Their final report is based on a survey distributed to more than 2,000 NGeners in the nonprofit, government, and private sectors. It asked about perspectives on leadership development, cross-sector collaboration, and how to respond to major challenges facing our communities. 

So what did they find? Here are the major takeaways – and some of them may surprise you.

  • NGeners mostly agree on the top issues facing communities, the nation and the world – with education, poverty, health and the environment topping out the lists
  • NGeners feel collaboration across sectors is very important but don’t know the people, leaders or the methods to facilitate collaboration
  • The majority of NGeners could not identify a single leader under the age of 40 who is effectively solving a societal problem
  • NGeners believe the nonprofit sector is best positioned to take the lead in engaging other sectors to solve problems
  • NGeners believe they need more organized leadership development opportunities

There are several things that truly stand out about these findings, and you can download the full report here. Perhaps what surprises me the most is the inability of my peers to identify other leaders under the age of 40 who are effectively solving social problems. Back in February we explored in a post on Social Citizens, "The Lost Generation of Social Entrepreneurs"  and came up with a diverse list of under 35 year olds who will have no problem serving as role models for their peers and who have chosen to focus a little less on profits and a little more on changing the world. That list continued to grow with the help of our readers.

In addition to not being able to identify these so-called generational leaders, I also found it interesting that "next gen" leaders don't have a good understanding of how to facilitate cross-sector collaborations. After all, we talk a lot about how Millennials thrive far better in collaborative environments as opposed to hierarchecal structures. I wonder however if Millennials thrive in groups of similar minded people, making it more difficult to reach across to others who may have different skills and backgrounds.  This is something we'll explore in more detail in a subsequent post.

In the meantime, it’s clear that the fellows' analysis and recommendations are not final conclusions, but instead provide an important starting point for further discussions about what leadership and collaboration really mean for rising leaders and our communities. I’d add that these conversations should be happening across all generations so that we can ensure more two-way sharing of innovative ideas.

Independent Sector will be hosting a call on August 19, to explore these ideas in greater depth - I hope participants in the call will represent diverse backgrounds, age cohorts and sectors in order to truly make it a meaningful discussion.

What are your take aways from this report? Are you surprised by any of their conclusions?

Comments

14 Jul 2010
Mat Dryhurst

That is a real surprise, I can think of a ton!

Matt Flannery - Kiva
Esther Duflo - MIT
Sean Dockray - The Public School
Jacob Colker - The Extraordinaries
Brent Schulkin - Carrotmob
Lateefah Simon - Lawyer's Committee for Civil Rights
..........

Perhaps part of the problem is the emphasis on 'becoming' rather than 'being'. One of the assumptions of 'NextGen' leadership is that you are not already there yet! Perhaps this needs revision in an age of rapid, agile prototyping and idea spread? Most of the names above did not need to wait to be told they were leaders, they just took their idea and ran with it.

Thanks for bringing this up Kari!

14 Jul 2010
Jason Wyman

Thanks for printing this. I share the sentiments above. I am someone under 40 (34 to be exact) who is changing the world and is a leader. I don't need to become anything. And I know a ton of other under-40 folks who are also changing the world and are already leaders in their own right.

I think a part of the problem and an opprtunity here is a definition and frame around "leadership" and "changing the world". For me and most of my friends/colleagues/family/peers we are making small changes and small steps that we know will ripple out. We are cognizant that we are but one in an ever expanding and growing pool of people that also are changing the world. And we don't have an ego so big as to think of ourselves only.

When we talk about collaboration and collaborative environments, we also need to be aware that by actively working in collaboraticve spaces we are using a collaborative model. I'm not sure that the reflective practice is there to distill down the mechanics or functional operation of the collaborative process, but its roots are there. We are modeling it with our being. And by that very nature we will never become because we are.

Youth Worker Collective, an organization I've been a part of for 8 years, has a very specific and functional model of how to begin collaboration. We believe that ultimately collaboration must be rooted in the constiuencies served. We believe that a shared value base, some sort of project, and continuous reflection are what move people forwards together. Our model is grounded in youth development, service learning, adult learning androgogies, interfaith dialogue, and appreciative inquiry. It is a model that is dynamic, adaptable, iterative and generative.

All of this grew out of a need for youth workers, the professionals who work with or for youth,to come together to share resources and learn from one another. We comprise different sectors including health, social enterprise, after school, education, leadership development, religious institutions, etc. There is one unifying ideal: a better world for children and youth. And we are not the only ones to be doing this with, for, by, and on behalf of youth workers. There is a lot to be learned from this "classification" of workers in the broader society.

We also know our current place and history. We know that we can only make change by engaging those who want to make change. We have learned this lesson the hard way:through trial and error. Currently, our efforts have stayed localized because our scope and capacity is local. That doesn't mean our efforts won't be spread statewide, nationally and/or internationally. It does mean a different locus of control and intention. We believe that by actively changing our selves we WILL change the world. In fact, it is the only way change ever happens.

(Please forgive any misspellings. I typed this on my phone.)

Post new comment

Your email is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd><img><!—break--><blockquote><p><div><object><param><embed><h3><sup>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options