civic engagement

With more than 45 million voters between the ages of 18-29, the "youth vote" will again receive significant attention in the upcoming election cycle. But, are these voters being excluded from the democratic process? According to a new study from Rock the Vote, they just might be. Between outdated voter registration practices and other obstacles like difficulties casting ballots in many states, these barriers underscore the country's need to better prepare the next generation as a whole for active citizenship.

The study titled “Rock the Vote Voting System Scorecard,” was released earlier in June and measured state laws and policies in three key areas: voter registration, casting a ballot and young voter preparation. Survey organizers scored states on a 21-point scale and then ranked them based on their overall voting experience—serving as the first national benchmark that measures states’ laws and policies in these areas. The survey findings revealed that, “the average national score is only 41% (8.6 points out of 21 total) with Washington state ranking highest at 68% and South Carolina and Virginia at 18% performing at the bottom of our list. Only 15 states scored above 50%.”

Survey Findings

The Voting System Scorecard evaluated states in these three policy areas and identified the most significant obstacles:

• Voter Registration: According to the Scorecard, the “single greatest barrier to participation for young people” is voter registration. In fact, citizens ages 18 to 24 have the lowest rates of registration amongst all segments of the population. In the United States, voter registration remains a relatively cumbersome paper-based process that is often an unfamiliar process for first-time registrants.
• Casting a Ballot: There are several obstacles that impede Millennial voters from actually voting in elections once they have registered, including: lawmakers who believe that young voters should face more restrictions; voter identification inconsistencies; strict absentee voting laws; and military and overseas voting inefficiencies.
• Young Voter Preparation: The third category of the Voting System Scorecard is young voter preparation. The survey found that opportunities to learn about politics and government in schools are increasingly rare, and programs to register newly eligible high school students to vote are not widespread. Those who do not become engaged may find themselves “increasingly frustrated and disengaged from this country’s democratic system.”

Survey Recommendations

Overall, the survey revealed that “young Americans are frustrated with a voter registration system that is inefficient, inconvenient and wasteful.” This was reflected in the results where high-scoring states that had the best overall voting experience, for the most part, offered either Same Day Registration or online registration. Conversely, the organizers found that many of the states that did not score well lacked many of these more popular voting tools to facilitate engagement opportunities and a positive voter experience.

Addressing these tools/obstacles may hold the key to changing how the next generation takes to the polls. As the Millennial generation voters continue to establish their power at the polls, Rock the Vote continues to register and educate voters. In 2011, Rock the Vote is leading the charge toward making our electoral process more accessible to young people through our high school civics program, by rallying young people to stop unfair registration laws and push more modern approaches, and educating prospective 2012 candidates on how to incorporate young people in their campaigns.

What else can states, organizations and Millennials themselves do to empower themselves when it comes to voting at the polls? Are there other obstacles that you think need to be addressed?

• Check out some more information at these links:
• Twitter: http://twitter.com/#!/RockTheVote
• Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/rockthevote
• Read the full report here
• Send the report to your elected officials
   

This post was authored by Fiona Hoehn and Rachel White, interns of the Case Foundation.

Here on Social Citizens, we often times ask our readers how to best define the Millennial generation. Infographics and research tell us that Millennials are tech-savvy, intellectual and engaged, both on a community and national level. At the same time, Millennials are also extremely complex and often divided by issue, cause, area of study, and political party even among their peers. 

Jared Duval taps into these similarities and differences in his new book, Next Generation Democracy. Duval asks, “What can we learn and expect from the rising generation of so-called digital natives, or Millennials?  How are we different, if at all, from previous generations, and what skills, ethics, and approaches will inform our work as we rise to positions of influence in our society?” 

How can we shape the next generation democracy? 

Duval addressed these questions at the official launch of his book at Busboys and Poets in Washington, DC this week. Duval’s book argues that we can use the vast size and complexity of the Millennial population to our nation's advantage by creating a brighter, more united future for Americans. He defines Millennials not as a generation that just texts and tweets, but as one that has an incredible potential for “applying lessons from the world of Web 2.0 to the global challenges that now demand solving.”

The book provides a handful of personal accounts as told through Duval’s compelling narrative on how everyday, ordinary people use the principles of transparency, participation and collaboration in the open-source movement to enact large-scale social change. It’s written in a relatable and sensible tone that makes the book accessible not just to Millennials, but to the larger audience as well.

The launch event ended with an engaging open-ended discussion on Millennials and civic engagement, one that will hopefully be continued here and elsewhere on the web. If you’re interested in reading more, you can purchase a copy of Next Generation Democracy at your local bookstore or online at Amazon.com. You can also hear some of the audience’s opinions, including my own, on the topic in the video above.

So what does Next Generation Democracy mean to you? How do you think Millennials can take best advantage of the principles of open-source information and social media? And to what extent can this innovation be leveraged for democratic and governmental power? Feel free to join the discussion and let us know what you think of Duval’s book.

Guest blogger Andrea Lum is an intern for the Case Foundation.

Last Saturday, an estimated 215,000 people attended the Rally to Restore Sanity and/or Fear hosted by Jon Stewart of The Daily Show and Stephen Colbert of The Colbert Report. The two faux news anchors have a loyal following of more than one million viewers thanks to their ability to deliver commentary on everything from politics to pop culture with sharp tongues, comic skits and insightful observations. Much like their shows, the rally was part comedy and part entertainment, and managed to address difficult issues through laughter.

Throughout the day, even amongst the levity, funny signs and comedic bits, there was an underlying tone of seriousness and a realization about why we were all there in the first place—to raise our hands and say yes, I choose civil discourse; yes, I choose the right to make my own decision; and no, I will not blindly follow that which I am told to accept.

During a “moment of sincerity,” as Comedy Central dubbed it, Stewart expressed his hope that attendees would continue to “work together,” not by yelling and name-calling, but rather by compromise and compassion. Stewart discussed just how we’d reached this point in our society—seemingly so far from civility—and placed a large portion of the blame squarely on the 24/7 news media cycle and politicians on the Hill. The crowd straining to hear each of Stewart’s words nodded in agreement with his position that, “The news cycle didn’t create our problems, but it made solving them that much harder… if we amplify everything, we hear nothing.” In the end, Stewart challenged each person to be a vanguard of our country’s sanity and champion against fear by reminding us that, “Sanity has always been and will always be in the eye of the beholder.”

Now that the suspense surrounding the rally is over, we ponder what it all means and what the possible ramifications of this one moment in time will be on the Millennial generation, on Americans, on Election Day and beyond.

Comic Relief

Stewart and Colbert are just entertainers, aren’t they? Should we put stock in what they are saying or is this a publicity stunt? Looking back, it is not the first time they have blurred the line between entertainment and real life to get a few laughs—whether it’s in the hot seat during a debate or running for President in 2008.

Their ability to command our attention lies in their talents to transcend between the two genres and to blend the two worlds together. After all, it’s much easier to talk about a controversial topic or deal with what may be a frightening situation when it’s presented through satire and comedy, right? As Erica, a rally attendee and Millennial exclaimed, “I think [Stewart and Colbert] are entertainers, politicians, comedians and advocates. And I don't think that being both a comedian and a celebrity in any way diminishes the impact of their messages.”

Erica’s not alone in her sentiments. A report released by Rasmussen Reports in 2009 found that “nearly one-third of Americans under the age of 40 say satirical news-oriented television programs like The Colbert Report and The Daily Show… are taking the place of traditional news outlets.” In addition, “21% characterize programs these types of shows as at least somewhat influential in shaping their political opinions.” Most however (70%), of respondents (from all age groups) still say these types of shows are not influential.

Is Anyone Really Listening?

The dynamic comedy duo have long been heralded as the voice of the 18 to 34 year old demographic in particular. In fact, some pegged the rally as one that would define the Millennial generation, and in so polarize those from older generations.

Contrary to what many believed, the turnout at the rally was noticeably mutli-generational. It’s no surprise though when you look at demographics for both shows. The median age for both has actually gone up in recent years. As of 2009, the average viewer was age 41.4 for The Daily Show and age 38.3 for The Colbert Report. According to a report from Forbes.com, the number of viewers ages 18 to 34 actually fell between 14% and 15% for both shows between 2008 and 2009. Comedy Central spokespeople confirmed for Forbes however, that both shows “still attract the youngest viewers of the late night talk shows.” Looking around at the many people from all different generations at the rally, it was clear to see these statistics had come to life on the National Mall.

Is the Media Really to Blame?

We as a society are spending more time consuming news than a decade ago. Pew Research Center for the People & the Press found that technology has made the news much more accessible and therefore contributed to our increased consumption.

In an interesting twist, the same survey found that the public remains “skeptical” when it comes to trusting news from the major outlets. In fact, “no more than a third says they can believe all or most of the reporting by 14 major news organizations.” Believability ratings for all sources of news have seen a significant decline since the 1990s.

We also find ourselves forging a deepening divide between political parties and credibility ratings among new sources. Responses revealed that, “Republicans express far less confidence than Democrats in most major outlets.” When it comes to cable news outlets the divide is growing at an unprecedented rate. Take Fox News for example, “In 2000, about equal percentages of each [party] said they could believe all or most of what Fox News said (26% Republicans, 27% Democrats). Since then, Fox News’ credibility rating among Republicans has increased (now 41%). As a result, there is now a 20-point partisan gap in Fox News’ credibility ratings.”

Who do you believe? What sources can you trust? Is the media part of the problem as Stewart suggested? In the end, the choice is ours—we can choose to change the channel, pick a specific newspaper or click on one link instead of another. Ratings, subscriptions and number of views are the name of the game and to invoke the words of Captain Planet who was also in attendance at the rally, “the power is yours.”

What Happens Next?

That appears to be the big question looming on peoples’ minds—so now what? Stewart and Colbert shined a light on very ugly problems, but rather than lay out a 10-point plan, empowered people to make their own stand when it comes to our country’s future.

In light of the mid-term elections taking place today, it’s anybody’s guess whether or not this rally will impact peoples’ decision to vote in the short term. Patrick, another enthusiastic rally attendee who is a Millennial as well noted, “It seems like the right has a lot of energy and fervor going into the mid-term elections. This rally seems like a response to a lot of the hysteria being drummed up...” I guess we’ll just have to wait and see if Stewart and Colbert’s efforts will have a ripple effect or not in voting booths across America.

As for the longer-term impact of the rally, Erica reflected, “I think civic dialogue has been lost to the vocal minority and the media. I'm not sure if the rally itself will do much to impact the younger generation, but if anything, I think it will motivate the young people who are sympathetic to Jon Stewart's message to be more confident—but not louder—in the face of disagreement from others.” At the end of the day all we can ask for is that we agree to disagree rather than be uncivil. It is clear by the overwhelming attendance and positive word of mouth about the rally that there is something to all of this. I dare say it is perhaps a movement in the making.

Online Civics - coming soon to a school near you! Think about it, a class to mentor young people and help them use social media for social good? Well, perhaps not for another decade or so… the course isn’t offered yet in schools as far as I know, but I’m willing to bet that we just might see it integrated into the nation’s education curriculum before the end of this decade. A take on the traditional civics class that has long been a staple of many school programs, the online civics class would be designed to address ethical issues specific to online citizenship and the welfare of the online community.

What grade do Millennials get on their report cards when it comes to online citizenship?

At the recent Social Good Summit hosted by Mashable and 92Y, GoodPlay released a two-part study that highlighted the untapped potential young people (ages 15-25 and 10-14 respectively) represent when it comes to using social media for social good (watch the presentation). The study details qualitative interviews with young people regarding their social responsibilities and impact online. Carrie James, a researcher for the study, noted that most young people thought primarily about themselves while online and reported relatively little concern for how their use of social media or online actions might affect others. One respondent summarized that, “I do online what I want to do online. I don’t feel like it’s really anybody’s business to tell me what I shouldn’t do… I don’t really feel responsible to people online. I definitely feel it’s more for me, not for anyone else.”

Does such a thing as online ethics even matter in the real world?

Put yourself in the participants’ shoes… James asked the respondents what they thought about when downloading pirated MP3s. Did they think about their wallets, the impact on the artists, consequences for the music label? I’m guessing the ethical lines may have just become a bit more blurred for you now.

The discussion about the GoodPlay study did not go so far as to compare behavior online and offline, but it’s hard not to draw a correlation between the two sets of thoughts and actions. The major divide here according to James is that online we possess the ability to act anonymously  and there is potential for one’s actions to reach a much broader audience—thereby changing the way in which we relate to others online. In the group interviewed by GoodPlay, the Internet was seen as mostly for fun and not something with which youth could create change. Moreover, respondents felt that a lack of adult presence in their online experience contributed to the absence of moral and ethical support online.

With this unique generation of young Americans, we are seeing for the first time the rise of an interesting and potentially troubling paradigm—as the number of young online users grows, so too does the belief among this group that one’s actions do not impact or affect others in this community.

Class is in session.

From the GoodPlay study, James’ team identified several opportunities to engage youth in online civics. The study concluded that while “ethical thinking” online may be infrequent among this group, a more positive online civic experience can be created when youth see their online lives as those which are filled with meaning and responsibility. James proposes the following action steps to help motivate the younger generation to become more engaged online.

• Challenge young people to see themselves as citizens of the online community.
• Encourage youth to use social media for something greater than themselves.
• Move beyond “clicks” to deeper, sustained and more meaningful engagement related to issues beyond their personal network.

Extra credit.

This summation of James’ presentation only looks at one small piece of the GoodPlay study through the lens of youth participation online so I encourage you to watch the presentation and visit the resources yourself. Like any good study, the results inevitably lead to more questions… I am curious to know how the study participants saw themselves—as online citizens, apathetic residents of an online community or perhaps vanguards of the new online frontier? Do youth today see themselves as lacking the ethical thinking that is implied by the GoodPlay study suggested?  What do you think of the study? 

Anybody who followed my Tweets at ServiceNation and BlogHer know that I am a wee bit addicted to the microblogging service. Ok, I am a LOT addicted. So it should come as no surprise that I am digging Twitter Vote Report, the brainchild of Allison Fine and Nancy Scola that just went live today.

No, you cannot actually cast your vote via Twitter or text. Sorry. But what you CAN do is report on your voting experience, and help other people (or Tweeple) know what to expect, prepare, or avoid on Election Day. More instructions here on creating hashtags, sharing info, and using your mobile.

If a picture is worth 1000 words, then a YouTube video is worth conference fees and several hours of your life -- particularly when it's bringing you a fascinating panel from NCOC about Facebook's role in and impact on civic engagement.

That's right ... today's post is the as-promised third installment of our NCOC coverage, from our introduction, to Kristen's event notes, to the final video of Bill Galston, Sean Parker, and Joe Trippi (see below). So far, the comments and reactions here have been really thoughtful, even extending into posts/threads over at Beth's Blog and PhilanTopic.

So give this choice piece of cinema a look-see, and then check out the rest of Kristen's coverage after the fold!